Executive Summary

This Community Disaster Preparedness 2008 study is a joint initiative of Radio Djati FM and Health Communication Resources for the purpose of assessing the current levels of knowledge and awareness of disaster-preparedness among the people of Banda Aceh and Aceh Besar in the wake of the December 2004 earthquake and tsunami

The intent is to use the findings of this study to develop radio programs and associated activities leading to raised levels of awareness about disaster–preparedness in the communities, and especially among the most vulnerable sectors of the community. The station seeks to do this by working in close partnership with government and non-governmental agencies (NGOs) as well as with the communities themselves

Field research was conducted with the help of other interested parties. Twenty one students (19 post-graduate plus 2 undergraduate) from the Ar-Raniry Institute of Islamic Studies conducted the field surveys. The focus group interviews/discussions were conducted with the help of nine local NGOs while HCR and Radio Djati conducted a series of interviews with key government officials

The objectives of the study were as follows:

  1. To establish a baseline of the current level of awareness so that the station knows and understands where the information gaps lie
  2. To identify the potential impact that DMP radio programming can have on their lives
  3. To stimulate the wider community to become involved with Radio Djati in educating the community for disaster mitigation and preparedness
  4. To provide the foundation for an on-going series of planning, training and community-oriented radio programming that will help reduce the ultimate vulnerability of the Acehnese people in the event of future disasters

A random sample survey (n=984) was used to question the inhabitants of nine (9) sub-districts of Banda Aceh while eight focus groups were conducted in Aceh Besar among vulnerable people – the elderly, women, children and the disabled. Six key informant interviews were conducted with key officials representing government agencies involved in various aspects of disaster management, including disaster preparedness and mitigation, and disaster response

The survey helped identify where people were, what they were doing and how they responded when the earthquake and tsunami struck. It sought to assess what previous knowledge they had of what to do and compared it with what they now know in the light of experience and information campaigns. It also sought to identify what critical needs they faced, what information they sought and where they found it. In the midst of this what role do the media play in their lives and what are their radio listening habits?. It gives insights into the importance of relationships within the family and among neighbours, and the roles of the masyarakat, the meunasah/mosque, their faith, and the coffee shops in their lives. Practically it also revealed which radio stations people were listening to

More in-depth understanding of what people experienced and how they survived was gathered through the focus group interviews among the vulnerable. Heart-rending personal accounts told of the personal grief and trauma and added a lot of personal insights

The responses of each group were assessed in terms of their preparedness/knowledge, their information needs, their basic needs, their experience of fear, trauma and loss, their vulnerability, their religious observance, their means of survival and the role of media in their lives. Approximately 10% of those interviewed indicated that they had been permanently or temporarily disabled as a direct result of the tsunami

A further dimension was provided by the key informant interviews as government officials told of their experiences, their frustrations and concerns. Interviews yielded much useful information not only of the past but also the current issues that are being faced and current plans to better prepare the community through education and awareness campaigns and the prospects and trials of the early-warning system

Main Findings

  1. Among those who survived 60% were in their homes when the earthquake struck but this dropped to 40% by the time the tsunami hit. Most people survived by running away but two-thirds identified the loss of family and friends. One half cited emotional and psychological trauma while three-quarters of those surveyed lost their homes or had them badly damaged and one-third lost their source of income
  2. The widespread fear of another disaster being imminent led to panic. There was also fear over the spread of disease. Government agencies were decimated by loss of staff, buildings, vehicles and communication equipment. Coordination was the major challenge coupled with the collection and dissemination of information in the first few days and weeks
  3. Focus group interviews revealed that there was virtually no previous knowledge of tsunamis and no stories had been handed down. But in spite of this a significant number of people knew to look for a safe place. Seventy percent (70%) first knew of advancing tsunami wave from observing the behaviour of others while 12% commented on hearing sounds. Only a very small minority (1%) were warned by the traditional village alarm
  4. There appears to be little awareness of preparedness of any kind. Many interpreted the disaster to be the arrival of Judgment Day. Many turned to prayer or called others to pray. Much attention is now being drawn to the need for disaster preparedness and making their environment safer
  5. Radio messages have helped people recognize that DMP saves lives. Forty one percent (41%) affirmed this while another 19% acknowledged there is something they can do to reduce the impact of a disaster. Newspapers and television were also identified as a useful source of information by two-thirds of those interviewed. Apart from media the most popular sources of information was seen as being the masyarakat (community), warkop (coffee shops) and meunasah (local mosque)
  6. Questions asked to assess the current level of preparedness for various disasters reveal a number of misconceptions. While most chose to run to higher ground a worrying 35% selected the option to wait in their homes for further instructions when a tsunami happens. This suggests that there is much work yet to be done in terms of what people need to know. Many would also like to make their homes safer
  7. Government officials state that people are not yet ready to face another disaster. Many are still in a state of trauma. The infrastructure is not yet in place. People know instinctively to run but they need direction on where to run to. More escape buildings need to be built and upper floors allocated as possible refuges
  8. Reliable information is one of the most critical needs immediately following a major disaster, but in Aceh all regular media channels were totally destroyed. Most people sought information from family, the meunasah/mosque and from friends and neighbours. Most were immediately anxious to know where to find their loved ones, where to go to be safe, and what happened. Two days later most people sought information from the community and the meunasah/mosque
  9. Today national and provincial governments are recognising the need for getting reliable information out quickly and efficiently and new agencies have been setup. They recognise the need for information campaigns and the vital role the media can play. They would like to work more closely with media agencies in a concerted effort. People living in Aceh face the constant threat of natural disasters and the community needs to come to grips with the ever-present risks
  10. Two-thirds of Banda Aceh residents listen to radio every day. Besides listening at home one-quarter also listen on their mobile phones or with their friends and neighbours (17%) or at the warkop (12%). Radio Djati is among the top five most listened to radio stations in Banda Aceh all with a reach of 45% or more

Special Needs of Vulnerable People

Interviews with key local government officials

The six interviews provide valuable insights into the activities of government agencies as they engaged in the process of recovery. We hear firsthand of the challenges they faced in the aftermath of the tsunami. Chief among these was the need to normalize society and get the crippled infrastructure working once again, at a time when information flow was non-existent and communication channels totally destroyed

The mayor of Banda Aceh speaks eloquently to these challenges, together with representatives from SATKORLAK, DISTAMBEN, BMG, Dinas Sosial and INFOKOM We learn of their plans to bring disaster preparedness to the people through a wide variety of programs, starting with schools and communities. They all endorse the value of the media in helping further their programs. They share common concerns for the need for getting the early warning system working, and the need of the population at large to both trust and understand it

The head of the BMG monitoring station in Mata Ie, which has responsibility for monitoring earthquakes would like to see links forged between BMG and radio stations so that when another disaster strikes the information can be disseminated immediately without likely risk of disruption

Conclusions and Recommendations

There is room for many conclusions to be drawn but we have sought to identify some of the main ones:

We therefore recommend the following:

  1. That partnership and cooperation be a feature of the on-going programs. This should be across sectors and include government agencies, NGOs and local community leaders
  2. That radio stations develop plans for how to respond to disasters in cooperation with local government and community leaders. They have a vital role to play
  3. That mass media and radio in particular play a key role in helping inform and educate the community so that they are better prepared and aware, as well as encouraged to understand the practical things they can do in times of disaster
  4. That radio and TV stations develop the capability to survive disasters and to be on the air with appropriate information-based programming shortly after disasters strike. This also involves training of staff
  5. The development of integrated action plans for disaster-preparedness These might include the following:
    1. Specialist program initiatives for vulnerable people
    2. Develop disaster preparedness programs in conjunction with other developmental programs. They can be a component of micro-finance and livelihood programs, maternal and childcare programs, water and sanitation programs, and should not remain separate
    3. Development of emergency procedures with local and national government agencies
    4. Development of DMP programs with government agencies and NGOs
    5. Ensuring radio and TV stations are ready to perform key roles of media in emergency

Links

Use the following to read about the research project and Radio Djati in greater detail

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional